Global credit funds & CLO's
January 2020
| Issue 219
Published in London & New York.
Copyright Creditflux. All rights reserved. Check our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use.
Opinion credit
Putri Pascualy
‘Buying the dip’ is going to be a poor investment strategy when the next downturn comes
Senior credit strategist & PM
Paamco Prisma
January 2020
|
Issue 219
quotation mark
The next credit downturn will be shallower but more prolonged than the last, so what works will be different, too
Privately, many allocators have been expressing a quandary: there is a tremendous need to put capital to work, but they have reservations about the level of risk in the credit market. They also need to generate returns and withstand the pressure to keep up with their peer group (this is known as ‘fomo’, or fear of missing out). Combine these factors with concerns over equity market volatility and you can why see some allocators are turning towards private credit.
In my view, private credit can help, but part of the answer must be a draw-down structure for stressed and distressed situations, combined with an alpha-focused long/short credit strategy. This can help investors reduce credit risk and avoid cash drag by staying invested. Then they can be patient and wait for opportunities.
Finding a strategy that works in a dip
Every credit cycle is different and the causes of each market downturn are often specific to that particular event. More importantly, the linkage between cause and effect often only becomes obvious after the fact. Sounding the alarm when the party is in full swing is often a fruitless and frustrating task (trust me on this).

Nonetheless, the seed of a crisis is often sowed during the excesses of the prior period’s bull market. And there are some key points a thoughtful investor should keep in mind when anticipating and preparing for the next credit downturn.

First, a credit downturn does not take place in a smooth line. Expect periods of micro-bullishness even when the general trend is moving downwards. This means timing the market will be difficult, as opportunities come and go quickly. Even when one knows which strategy to invest in, executing the plan will be difficult — if not impossible — given that most investors need to go through their internal investment committees.

Second, excessive leverage in the banking system is not a major issue today and thus the next crisis is highly unlikely to play out like 2008. Thanks to a prolonged period of low interest rates, borrowers have termed out their liabilities, keeping their interest expenses low and reducing or eliminating covenants. So companies won’t all default at once, and the cycle is likely to start with those borrowers where weak fundamentals meet excessive leverage. As such, we expect a shallow but prolonged period of draw-down rather than the V-shaped pattern we saw in 2008. Furthermore, rather than a 2008-style market-wide blackout, this time around we are likely to see specific industries suffer.

Today, much of the risk-taking has moved from the public to the private market, which has learned from 2008 and done a good job matching the liquidity of underlying assets to liabilities. Selling pressure — in timing and severity — will vary by lender and is likely to have idiosyncratic drivers. We should expect asset sales to be dominated by private, pre-negotiated bilateral or club deals rather than public auctions or b-wics.

Since 2008 is not going to be a good playbook for the next cycle turn, ‘buying the dip’ will be a poor investment strategy.
Private credit should be uncorrelated
A few things should be considered when building a credit portfolio today. It’s paramount to ensure that the private credit allocation is truly investing in niche and uncorrelated strategies. One of the oft-cited benefits of private credit is the lower volatility and lack of correlation to broader market risk. But in middle-market direct lending the pressure to put capital to work has pushed some lenders to participate in syndicated deals: the very strategy they were diversifying from.

On top of this, portfolio construction matters. As we’ve already seen in select situations and sectors in the credit market (energy, retail and mining), some situations are cheap for a reason. In this scenario, fundamental research alone is insufficient. Weak covenants and disruption of business models mean future recoveries are likely to be low. The retail sector is a case in point: there, most bankruptcy cases have ended in liquidation. This means that, for investors, avoiding landmines is going to be just as important as picking the right situations.
Share this article:
Share this report:
Share this report: